In a landmark ruling that could reshape the future of online gaming in Chile, the Supreme Court instructed six major internet providers to block access to online sports betting and gambling sites immediately. The decision, issued on September 29, 2025, reflects the judiciary’s strict interpretation of Chile’s gambling laws and reinforces the exclusive rights of licensed operators.
Background of the Case
The ruling responded to a protection claim filed by Lotería de Concepción against six leading internet service providers: Claro, Entel, GTD, Telefónica, WOM, and VTR. Lotería argued that illegal gambling websites undermined its exclusive rights and violated national regulations.
In May 2025, the Court of Appeals of Santiago rejected the petition, siding with the internet providers. The Third Chamber of the Supreme Court overruled that decision, siding with Lotería and granting the petition to block online gambling sites.
Court’s Reasoning
The Supreme Court confirmed that games of luck are illegal in Chile unless licensed. Only Lotería de Concepción, Polla Chilena, authorized racetracks, and licensed casinos may legally operate gambling.
The justices clarified that in the iGaming sector, only Lotería, Polla, and Teletrak may provide specific games. All other sites are illegal, so internet providers must block access.
The court also addressed net neutrality. Providers may not block lawful content but must block unlawful content. The court held that failing to comply infringes on Lotería de Concepción’s exclusive property rights.
Dissenting Opinions and Legal Nuances
Justice Mireya López and Attorney Carlos Urquieta dissented, affirming the lower court’s denial. They raised concerns about excessive regulation, internet freedom, and providers’ obligations to restrict gambling.
Despite the dissent, the majority decision strengthens protections for state-authorized operators and curbs unauthorized digital platforms.
Supporting Evidence and Stakeholder Involvement
The Supreme Court relied on reports from the Superintendencia de Casinos de Juego and the Undersecretariat of Telecommunications (Subtel). Polla Chilena also joined Lotería de Concepción in requesting stricter measures against illegal operators.
Implications for the Gambling Industry
The ruling marks a milestone in Chile’s internet gambling policy. It safeguards licensed operators while limiting unauthorized sites that threaten consumer protections and state revenues.
For online service providers, the decision imposes a legal duty to control gambling-related content. Regulators will monitor compliance, and the case sets a precedent for future digital content management.
Players will lose access to numerous foreign gambling websites, but the products of authorized operators like Lotería de Concepción and Polla Chilena gain legitimacy and security.
The Supreme Court’s order strengthens Chile’s efforts to reclaim control of its online gambling sector. By enforcing the exclusive authority of licensed providers and holding ISPs accountable, the ruling aims to protect both the industry and consumers.
Although the minority opinion leaves some questions about internet regulation unresolved, this decision represents a groundbreaking step toward order and oversight in Chile’s gambling market.
